Film and Persepolis

Persepolis is an alive bourgeon directed by MarJane Satrapi and Vincent Paronnaud. The shoot down was based on the novel Persepolis compose by MarJane Satrapi. It followed the storyline of the daybook. It showed the life of MarJane Satrapi growing up during the Iranian ethnical Revolution. Persepolis was re exclusivelyy vibrant to get word at with stunning visuals in its black and unclouded animated style. The unit take up was an emotional roll coaster ride from MarJane world extremely gifted and in love to her homeless on the streets of Vienna. It held your inte persist from move to finish.The scud garnered critical cclaim from its critics and it was nominated for several prestigious awards. It withal did well in the loge persona by recording a fifteen 1 thousand thousand dollar profit. I melodic theme that the pitiful picture was current good myself and it in reality gave viewers an interesting grimace at the revolution. I ruling that Persepolis was a in truth good picture. It was a coming of age ingest ab out(p) MarJane growing up during the Iranian Cultural Revolution. It showed her vibrant personality and how she grew up to become the sure-fire author and take away director she is today.The whole demand is make in an living style and I really conceptualize this elped the rent a cud. It gave the film a sentiency of originality and it was a big flip-flop from the things we normally examine in films nowadays. Without the film being in an animation form I think that a lot would energize been taken extraneous from it. A lot of Persepolis glamor came from the fact that it was animated. The animation helped viewers become more emotionally given to MarJane. With this being verbalize I panorama Persepolis had a rattling good mix of drama, comedy, somber moments and it unplowed you interested throughout.I dont aim both criticisms about the film at all. There wasnt ne point in the film where I was bored, confused or upright uninterested in anyway. It was honestly one of the beaver depictions IVe recently seen and I thoroughly enjoyed it. all(a) of the movie analyses that I have seen online have been very(prenominal) good. From RottenTomatoes to bran-new York propagation movie reviews all of the reviews have been good. At RottenTomatoes the film had an extremely high percentage of critics that want it at 97 percent. The sore York Times called the film a perfect expression of imagination and empire kudosd the film calling it stark and beautiful.I harmonise with most if not all of the movie reviews that IVe seen. The reviews all praised the movie for being able to have very smooth changes in mood and for its sharp visuals. Persepolis de buted at the 2007 Cannes film festival where it won multiple awards including the very prestigious Jury Prize. It then went on to fulfil the most prestigious award at the capital of the United Kingdom film festival by winning the Southerland trophy. In an interview with Moviefone a few days by and by Persepolis was released Satrapi explained why they decided to keep the film in the animated condition it was in in the novel.She explained that she didnt get along how to type and she and Paronnaud ere more into art and drawing anyway. Satrapi state in the interview that she and Paronnaud were not technical flock (Satrapi 1). This is a reason that the film was in the frozen it was in. I think that keeping the comic book look helped the film a lot. It gave it a sense of originality and it allowed them to make funny over the top animations. The whole script was written in pencil by Parronaud and Satrapi because they didnt go through now to use computers. I mentation ith the whole vibe ot the movie.I survey that Persepolis was a very refreshing movie given the types of ovies that we see now. It had a little bit of everything. In the New York Times review of the film they floutd with my point that I made earlier about the animat ion greatly helping the movie. New York Times importr A. O Scott said that if Persepolis had been a conventional memoir instead than a graphic novel, Ms. Satrapis account of her youth in pre- and post-revolutionary Iran would not have been quite as moving or as marvelous (Scott 1). I agree with this quote one hundred percent. As I tell earlier, the animation really helped Persepolis move along as a movie.I think that without the animation Persepolis would have been a boring movie and it wouldnt be relevant. This isnt to study that the storyline isnt good or well melodic theme out I Just think that it wouldnt have been as successful or touching with real life actors portraying the roles. The review really seemed to praise the animation of Persepolis a lot. Scott claimed that the visuals of Vienna and Tehran glowering the geography into poetry (Scott 1). He as well praised the fact that Persepolis isnt an animated childrens movie and that its nice to see an animated movie being ble to have so much meaning.The rest of the review praised the movie for its moving characters and the great Jobs that Chiara Mastroianni, Catherine Deneuve and Danielle Darrieux did interpretive program acting for the main characters of the film. He said that Sony did a great Job by getting the movie voice acted into English because had it just been subtitled to English it would of took outdoor(a) from the trueity of the film. All in all A. O Scotts review of the film was highly positive. He had no criticisms about the film. Peter Bradshaw of The Guardian gave the film a very high review.His movie review was also very similar to my themes on the film. The visuals really helped the film according to Bradshaw Persepolis funny and moving with a bracingly authentic feel, reproducing the graphic work with broad, bold strokes and a depth-of-field mental picture achieved with a recessive series of two-dimensional planes, handle the ocean waves at the back of a panto set (Bradshaw 1 ). I agreed with most of the comments that Bradshaw had for the movie. He suasion that Persepolis was a fresh original story and it was told in a way that a story hasnt been told before.I survey it was nteresting that Bradshaws only criticism of the film was something that Scott had praised about the film earlier. Bradshaw didnt think that the English dubbed version was that good. He thought that Chiara Mastroianni and Catherine Deneuve both struggled with the voice acting and you can disclose there heavily accented English accents. All in all Peter Bradshaw really standardised Persepolis and his only criticism was a very humble one. Helen O Hara of Empire magazine gave the film four out of five stars. She seemed to enjoy the visuals but not as much as Bradshaw and Scott did.She praised the film ore for its storyline did she did that animation. O Hara really enjoyed MarJane as a young girl by stating Marane-as-a-child is one of the most appealing characters in years, happy to embrace new ideas like the latest Igglepiggle and believe herself, briefly, to be a prophet appointed by God (O Hara 1). I thought that O Haras interview went the deepest into the real storyline and characters of the movie rather than the visuals. She really like the film for the roller coaster of emotions that it sent you on and as I stated earlier sne really enjoyed Marane as a character.O Hara also gave the animation good words. She thought that it was a real change from the incredible animations that we see nowadays in movies like Shrek but Persepolis pulled it away flawlessly. O Hara made this point by saying The monochromatic animation is stark and beautiful, and MarJanes an appealing narrator. Often hilarious, sometimes tragic, this may be low-tech, but its high-class (O Hara 1). I think that this is the perfect way to sum up Persepolis in one sentence. CNNs Tom kind-heartedness also gave the film very high praise. He thought the visuals were mazing and he also enjoyed t he characters and the storyline a lot.He thought that Persepolis should of won an Oscar that year and he really enjoyed the originality of the film. I think that Charity enjoyed every aspect of the film more than any otherwise person who reviewed the film. He loved the characters the animation and the storyline. As with all the other reviews the main aspect of the article was Persepoliss visual animations. Charity claimed that Persepolis has some of the blithe, spindly finesse of a New Yorker cartoon, but a cartoon that at any given moment threatens to esc remnant into inky expressionist sobriety (Charity 1).He really seemed to enjoy the throwback feel that Persepolis had and he thought that the film gave homage to Disneys earliest days. Charitys review gave me another viewpoint on Persepolis as a film. I never thought of the movie as a moving New Yorker cartoon or homage to some of Disneys earliest films. This made me treasure the movie even more than I already did. When list. c om writer James Mottram interviewed Satrapi we were able to get an perspicacity into what Satrapis meaning of the film was and how successful she thought he film would be in America.Satrapi stated she didnt like the film being called an history because An autobiography is a book that flock write to solve the problems with those roughly them. They dont dare to say things to their family and friends, so they decide to write in revenge. That is not what I did. (Mottram 1) I thought that the film was an autobiography as well but Satrapi made the film so I imagine she knows best. Later in the interview Satrapi explains that she thought the film would be successful in the United States. She claimed that the just American erson wasnt ignorant and dumb.I think that MarJanes emplacement and demeanor in her real life interviews really reflects her character in Persepolis. The interview mainly think on the heavy(a) work that it took to make Persepolis. MarJane stated that she thought all of her animators would do the work and she would end up rich and famous but this wasnt the case. She said she was the first one there and the last one to leave every day but her hard work paid off. This was shown by her 15 cardinal dollar profit. All in all I thought that Persepolis was a fantastic movie and the reviews I have ead have agreed with me.The visuals were stunning and the characters were very easy to connect with. It was the most interesting autobiography that I have ever seen and it taught me a lot about a topic that I didnt know anything about. I think that Persepolis was close to flawless as a movie can get. There were no serious complaints about it from anyone and I couldnt even mystify a bad review for it on the network or anywhere else. Persepolis shows that thinking out of the box can really pay off if its done right, and I think it really should motivate people to follow their visions.